It's a subtle difference but very important. The point of Mixbus is to revert to the buss-style mixing that is used in "hit-making" studios. Secondly: as you inferred, we discourage the DAW-style mixing workflow. We will fix that bug in an upcoming version. So my main question is how do they fair for basic MIDI processes comparatively? Also how do they both compare with plugin compatibility?įirstly, there is a bug: the direct outputs of the tracks should indeed pan with the main panner (this is how it's shown in our signal-flow diagram). Is it true? I also like that Reaper is CPU less intensive, also true? I've read about Mixbus' MIDI is a little clunky, unintuitive and limited. I would probably just need some automation and effects. I'm not looking for expert level MIDI features either. I quite like the mixbus compression feature and the analog tape saturation that I've listened too but its not a deal breaker. I'd like to try them both to compare but with the discount offer for mixbus running out soon I thought I'd see what you guys and gals think and maybe it'll spur me to take the plunge.
After reading a lot of reviews (Slant etc.) it seems they are both rated pretty highly and have everything I need. I've narrowed it down to Reaper and Mixbus (Mixbus is currently on discount for $15 for the next day or so). I was a huge fan of the EXS24 or example. I will be mostly recording some guitar tracks that I want to fill out with MIDI drums, synths, pianos, samplers etc.
Reaper vs mixbus mac#
Coming from using Logic on a Mac I'm trying to find something similar. I'm trying to decide on a DAW to use on my Ubuntu OS.
0 kommentar(er)
